|
Post by sigot on Aug 4, 2017 13:08:54 GMT
Hello everyone, call me Sigot.
I am brand new to world building in D&D. I am looking to create a world that my party will explore from lvl 1 to maybe 15 or 16. My campaign setting is going to be in a world in which the pantheon has 5 major religions that worship 1 or many God's. I think it would be cool if (for reasons yet decided) all 5 religions we're at war for a very long time, until one of the religions began to win every battle and eventually siezed control of almost all territory forcing the other 4 faction to surrender. Not out of spite but fear of such a long and bloody war occuring again all other fourm of religion are banned and suppressed ruthlessly. I was hoping the party could explore the world and see how this has affected the various societys. I also had the idea of a Mastermind beholder behind the reason one side won the war. Sort if puppeteering leaders of that faction.
I apologise for the ranty nature of this post as I have nothing down on paper yet But on a scale from 1-10 how needlessly contrived is this.
|
|
|
Post by DM Lord Neptune on Aug 4, 2017 14:26:20 GMT
I wouldn't say this is contrived at all. You have a world with five societies that are based around a central religion, which is very plausible, especially with a good geography. It sounds like each of the 5 factions would be relatively similar in size to one another before the tides are turned. It also makes a lot of sense that each faction would have a leader, or counsel, that was thoroughly convinced that their gods were the best ones to follow and that the other four religions in the world were a threat to their gods' existence. Heck, you could even have it where each of the religions' gods were real and all at war among one another and using the five societies as pawns in that war since they couldn't directly interfere. Perhaps the gods' power grew greater the more followers they had, etc, which would give them incentive to do what you planned. One of the gods, in this case, could have found a way to sway a Mastermind beholder into doing what you suggest, which sound very compelling.
In the end, it sounds like the normal people of the world, those most affected by war, were mostly on board with whoever the victor was, simply because war sucks for the life of a peasant, so they ended up being happy enough to quell any sort of alternate religious fervor simply in fear that war would spark up again. If the god who one is an evil god, however, then they may also be living in fear of that god's wrath, and reluctantly worship him while secretly planning a rebellion or something, as they may be living life feeling like prisoners.
|
|
|
Post by sigot on Aug 4, 2017 17:49:54 GMT
I definitely like the idea of the God's being real and active in the world using the 5 societys as pawns. I had a similar idea but I had trouble putting it into words. How ever it does go against one of the 5 religions I had in mind. One that wanted it's followers to live humble lives. Not to sure how humble Waring is. Maybe I could spin there doctrine to be that they believe everyone should live simple lives and converting as many people as possible is encourged, even by force.
|
|
|
Post by DM Lord Neptune on Aug 4, 2017 18:15:44 GMT
You could just have that fifth faction be a neutral faction that got swept up in the war between the other four factions. Maybe their god(s) tried to keep them away from the fights and the other factions just left them alone aside from displacing them each time a war erupted in their neighborhood. These gods would then be neutral in the gods' war. But when the dominant faction with the beholder started taking control, they didn't care about this society's neutrality and cut them down instead of just displacing them. This would have caused them to be one of the first societies to fall since they would have been sitting ducks. Better to surrender early than to be wiped out entirely. They could then continue on the philosophy of their gods while 'worshiping' the gods of the victors. This would avoid conflict as well as continue to allow them to be a peaceful people.
|
|